Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. v. Board of Trade

Supreme Court

Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. v. Board of Trade

459 U.S. 1026, 103 S. Ct. 434

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 29, 1982

DocketNo. 82-327; No. 82-526

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 459 U.S. 1026 (Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. v. Board of Trade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. v. Board of Trade, 459 U.S. 1026, 103 S. Ct. 434 (1982).

Pincite

Opinion

C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of Securities Industry Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae in No. 82-327 granted. Upon consideration of the suggestions of mootness filed by the petitioners, the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted, the judgments are vacated, and the cases are remanded with directions to dismiss the petitions for review as moot. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U. S. 36 (1950).

Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and these cases.

Reported below: Nos. 82-327 (first case) and 82-526 (first case), 677 F. 2d [1027]*10271137; Nos. 82-327 (second case) and 82-526 (second case), 679 F. 2d 894.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of Securities Industry Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae in No. 82-327 granted. Upon consideration of the suggestions of mootness filed by the petitioners, the petitions for writs of certiorari are granted, the judgments are vacated, and the cases are remanded with directions to dismiss the petitions for review as moot. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U. S. 36 (1950).

Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and these cases.

Reported below: Nos. 82-327 (first case) and 82-526 (first case), 677 F. 2d [1027]*10271137; Nos. 82-327 (second case) and 82-526 (second case), 679 F. 2d 894.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

459 U.S. 1026, 103 S. Ct. 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-board-options-exchange-inc-v-board-of-trade-scotus-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack