Chicago Avenue Partners v. Broan-Nutone

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-1784

___________

Chicago Avenue Partners, Ltd., *

*

Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota.

Broan-Nutone, LLC, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: December 14, 2007 Filed: April 7, 2008

___________

Before RILEY, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

RILEY, Circuit Judge.

The facts of this case are virtually identical to those outlined in Integrity Floorcovering, Inc. v. Broan-Nutone, LLC, No. 07-1824.1 We incorporate by

1 Unlike Integrity Floorcovering, Inc., Chicago Avenue Partners, Ltd. contended the bathroom fan at issue was not hard-wired into the building structure, but utilized a plug. This difference does not alter the conclusions reached here. Whether considered fully hard-wired or not, the fan required installation significantly beyond plugging the unit into an outlet. The fan required ventilation directly to the outside air, not into walls or ceiling space. The fan was to be fastened by nails into a stud or joist, with a duct run to a hole in the roof or wall. Assembly required the services of someone “. . . familiar with methods of installing electrical wiring . . . [or] a qualified

2

reference our opinion in No. 07-1824 and, for the reasons outlined there, affirm the judgment of the district court.

______________________________

electrician.” The fan had to be connected to the building’s power supply by bringing the power cable to the fan, and also utilizing a ground wire and grounding clip.