Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Taylor

40 Ill. 280
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1866
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 40 Ill. 280 (Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Taylor, 40 Ill. 280 (Ill. 1866).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice \Walker

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an action on the case brought by appellee against appellant to recover for injury to stock, occasioned by their engine and cars running upon their road. It is averred, as the law requires, that the road had been open for use more than six months previous to the time the injury was inflicted, and that it thereby became the duty of the road at the place where the accident occurred, to erect and maintain a sufficient fence to prevent stock from getting upon the track of the road, but that they had neglected to perform that duty, whereby the injury occurred. This averment was material and should have been proved to authorize a recovery.

We have carefully examined this entire record, and fail to find any proof of this averment. In the absence of such evidence, the verdict of the jury cannot be sustained; and the court below erred in refusing, for that reason, to set it aside; and, for this error, the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chicago & Great Western Railroad v. Wedel
44 Ill. App. 215 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
40 Ill. 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-alton-railroad-v-taylor-ill-1866.