Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Smith
This text of 21 Ill. App. 202 (Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff recovered $15 for medical services rendered to a person who had been injured by a train on defendant’s road. It was alleged the services were rendered at the instance of the conductor and station agent. There was evidence tending to make out the case. The only point upon which there is difficulty relates to the legal right of the plaintiff to practice medicine. Conceding he must prove this before he can collect his bill, slight evidence would suffice.
He testified without objection that he had practiced since 1872, and that he had a certificate as required by the State Board. It was shown that his name appeared on the register of physicians in the County Clerk’s office. This is enough as against the defendant, who called him, and thereby recognized his right to exercise the functions of his profession.
The judgment will be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 Ill. App. 202, 1886 Ill. App. LEXIS 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-alton-railroad-v-smith-illappct-1886.