Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Maddox
This text of 92 Mo. 469 (Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Maddox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff had no standing in a court of equity to enjoin the defendants from tearing down its fences in obedience to the order of the court lawfully issued. If, as is alleged in the reply, the commissioners appointed for the purpose of assessing damages, assessed none to plaintiff, and made no report on the subject of plaintiff’s damages, this furnishes no ground for the interposition of a court of equity, for the reason that the statute affords a remedy by granting an appeal; the rule being, as has so often been announced by this court, that, where the law affords a remedy ample and adequate, equity declines to interfere. Shelbina, Hotel Ass’ n, v. Parker, 58 Mo. 327; Kelly v. Hurt, 74 Mo. 561; Bobb v. Graham, 89 Mo. 200.
This results in affirming the judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 Mo. 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chicago-alton-railroad-v-maddox-mo-1887.