Home/Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York/Chibas v. Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance

Chibas v. Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance

164 Misc. 2d 1045, 630 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1995 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 393
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJune 8, 1995
StatusPublished

This text of 164 Misc. 2d 1045 (Chibas v. Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chibas v. Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance, 164 Misc. 2d 1045, 630 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1995 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 393 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order and judgment unanimously affirmed with $10 costs. The record establishes that under the circumstances plaintiff had an insurable interest in the motor vehicle of which he [1046]*1046was the registrant (see, A-Drive Corp. v General Acc. Group, 114 AD2d 430; cf., Silberman v Royal Ins. Co., 184 AD2d 562).

DiPaola, P. J., Collins and Ingrassia, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

A-Drive Corp. v. General Accident Group
114 A.D.2d 430 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Silberman v. Royal Insurance
184 A.D.2d 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 Misc. 2d 1045, 630 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1995 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chibas-v-interboro-mutual-indemnity-insurance-nyappterm-1995.