Chibas v. Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance

164 Misc. 2d 1045, 630 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1995 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 393
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided June 8, 1995·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order and judgment unanimously affirmed with $10 costs. The record establishes that under the circumstances plaintiff had an insurable interest in the motor vehicle of which he [1046]*1046was the registrant (see, A-Drive Corp. v General Acc. Group, 114 AD2d 430; cf., Silberman v Royal Ins. Co., 184 AD2d 562).

DiPaola, P. J., Collins and Ingrassia, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chibas v. Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance, 164 Misc. 2d 1045, 630 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1995 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 393 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

164 Misc. 2d 1045 (Chibas v. Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

A-Drive Corp. v. General Accident Group
114 A.D.2d 430 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Silberman v. Royal Insurance
184 A.D.2d 562 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)