Chiaverini v. Murray

237 A.D. 856
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1932·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order granting peremptory mandamus order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and motion denied. The relator failed to show that he had been appointed in compliance with the requirements of the municipal civil service commission’s rules; on the contrary, it affirmatively appears by the answering affidavit that there had been no such compliance on his part. Hence, he never had been legally appointed (Matter of Meehan v. Flaherty, 119 App. Div. 128; People v. Ingham, 107 id. 41), and even though the petitioner had served in the position to which he seeks reinstatement, that fact did not cure an illegal appointment. (People ex rel. Lee v. Gleason, 32 App. Div. 357.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chiaverini v. Murray, 237 A.D. 856 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

237 A.D. 856 (Chiaverini v. Murray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burke v. Hayden
2 Misc. 2d 1040 (New York Supreme Court, 1956)
McInerney v. Valentine
181 Misc. 1062 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)
Welling v. Fullen
164 Misc. 456 (New York Supreme Court, 1937)
In re Phillips
240 A.D. 705 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1933)