Chiasson v. State

798 S.W.2d 927, 304 Ark. 110, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 631
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedDecember 10, 1990
DocketRC 90-58
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 798 S.W.2d 927 (Chiasson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chiasson v. State, 798 S.W.2d 927, 304 Ark. 110, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 631 (Ark. 1990).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petitioner James L. Chiasson pleaded guilty in 1986 to one count of incest. In 1989 he filed a timely petition to vacate the conviction. The petition was styled a petition for post-conviction relief pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule 37, or in the alternative, a petition for writ of habeas corpus. The petition was denied and an order entered January 23, 1990. The petitioner, who did not file a timely notice of appeal with the circuit clerk, has now tendered the record to this court. He seeks a rule on the clerk to lodge the record despite the untimely notice of appeal.

We will grant a belated appeal of an order denying a petition for post-conviction relief if good cause is shown for the petitioner’s failure to file a timely notice of appeal. Peterson v. State, 289 Ark. 452, 711 S.W.2d 830 (1986). We have held that good cause can be established by the petitioner where the state is unable to demonstrate that the circuit clerk promptly provided the petitioner with á copy of the court’s order as required by Criminal Procedure Rule 37.3. Here, the petitioner contends that he was not provided a copy of the order until March 13, 1990, after the time for filing a timely notice of appeal had elapsed. As the state has indicated that it has no objection to the granting of the motion for rule on the clerk, it may be assumed that the state is unable to demonstrate that the circuit clerk complied with Rule 37.3. Therefore, we will permit the record on appeal to -be lodged. See Porter v. State, 287 Ark. 359, 698 S.W.2d 801 (1985).

Motion granted..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nelson v. State
2013 Ark. 316 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2013)
Rutledge v. State
139 S.W.3d 518 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2003)
Tarry v. State
57 S.W.3d 163 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2001)
Marion Lovell v. Larry Norris
Eighth Circuit, 1999
Porter v. State
2 S.W.3d 73 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
798 S.W.2d 927, 304 Ark. 110, 1990 Ark. LEXIS 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chiasson-v-state-ark-1990.