Chiarello v. Vincent

51 A.D.2d 1015, 381 N.Y.S.2d 117, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11787

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel respondent to relocate petitioner to a certain cellblock within the facility in order to alleviate his respiratory condition, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated March 13, 1975, which, after a hearing, dismissed the petition. Judgment modified, on the facts, by deleting therefrom the provision dismissing the petition and by substituting therefor provisions (1) denying petitioner’s request that he be relocated to J-block and (2) requiring respondent to reoffer petitioner a transfer to E-block or F-block. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Petitioner has been offered a transfer to E-block and F-block, each of which, in accordance with the physicians’ recommendations, provides more distance from a radiator than does his present cell location. Petitioner’s assertion that only J-block, an honor and minimum security block, provides conditions which will alleviate his condition, was not substantiated. Latham, Acting P. J., Margett, Damiani, Rabin and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chiarello v. Vincent, 51 A.D.2d 1015, 381 N.Y.S.2d 117, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11787 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

51 A.D.2d 1015 (Chiarello v. Vincent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.