Chiaramonte v. Hornstein

180 A.D. 899

This text of 180 A.D. 899 (Chiaramonte v. Hornstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chiaramonte v. Hornstein, 180 A.D. 899 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Appellants have not complied with rule 41, and also have failed to excuse their delay under our special rule by showing from the [900]*900facts out of which the controversy arose that the appeal has any merit. Motion granted, and appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
180 A.D. 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chiaramonte-v-hornstein-nyappdiv-1917.