Chiappone v. City of New York Department of Consumer Affairs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chiappone v. City of New York Department of Consumer Affairs

66 A.D.2d 809, 411 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14121

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 18, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 66 A.D.2d 809 (Chiappone v. City of New York Department of Consumer Affairs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chiappone v. City of New York Department of Consumer Affairs, 66 A.D.2d 809, 411 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14121 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review respondent’s determination granting petitioner’s landlord certain parking lot licenses and to impose additional penalties against petitioner’s landlord for allegedly violating parking lot licensing provisions of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 18, 1977, which, inter alia, dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Upon the record, respondent’s determination to grant the parking lot licenses at issue was not made in violation of lawful procedure, and did not constitute an abuse of discretion (see Administrative Code of City of New York, ch 32, § 773-4.0; § B32-251.0 et seq.). Furthermore, no abuse of discretion appears with respect to the amount of the fines respondent imposed against petitioner’s landlord. Suozzi, J. P., Rabin, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review respondent’s determination granting petitioner’s landlord certain parking lot licenses and to impose additional penalties against petitioner’s landlord for allegedly violating parking lot licensing provisions of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 18, 1977, which, inter alia, dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Upon the record, respondent’s determination to grant the parking lot licenses at issue was not made in violation of lawful procedure, and did not constitute an abuse of discretion (see Administrative Code of City of New York, ch 32, § 773-4.0; § B32-251.0 et seq.). Furthermore, no abuse of discretion appears with respect to the amount of the fines respondent imposed against petitioner’s landlord. Suozzi, J. P., Rabin, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 A.D.2d 809, 411 N.Y.S.2d 357, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chiappone-v-city-of-new-york-department-of-consumer-affairs-nyappdiv-1978.