Chia v. Wells Fargo Bank NA

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 19, 2010·No. 092018·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2018

DOLORES L. CHIA,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK NA, as servicer for U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee for Structural Asset Securities Corporation Trust 2005-WF3; U.S. NATIONAL BANK ASSOCIATION; WELLS FARGO BANK NA, exclusive and inclusive of its subsidiaries including: Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Premier Asset Services, Wells Fargo Asset Corporation; RICHARD A. SMISSEN; MICHAEL V. SMISSEN; KATHRYN SMISSEN WYN; SCOTT M. WHEATLEY, as an individual and as the CEO of Jabez Mortgage Group, LLC, Executive Settlement Services, Wheatley Law Firm, TitleSolve; LA-Z-BOY, INC.; SAMUEL I. WHITE; J. DOES 1-50, XXXCORPORATIONS 1-50,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00670-LMB-TRJ)

Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 19, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Delores L. Chia, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Shattuck Finberg, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Dolores L. Chia appeals from the district court’s

order denying her motion to amend her complaint and determining

that, following her discharge in bankruptcy, she lacked standing

to bring claims against Wells Fargo Bank, NA, arising out of the

refinance of her mortgage and the subsequent foreclosure sale of

her home. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, although we grant Chia’s motion for leave

to file an amended reply brief, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Chia v. Wells Fargo Bank NA, No. 1:09-

cv-00670-LMB-TRJ (E.D. Va. Aug. 3 & 5, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chia v. Wells Fargo Bank NA, (4th Cir. 2010).

Chia v. Wells Fargo Bank NA (Chia v. Wells Fargo Bank NA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.