Chi Chu v. Surgenor National Leasing, Ltd
This text of 233 A.D.2d 850 (Chi Chu v. Surgenor National Leasing, Ltd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying the motion of Surgenor National Leasing, Ltd., and Gilbert S.H. Au (defendants) to dismiss upon the ground of forum non conveniens. Defendants failed to establish that the Province of Ontario, Canada, would be a more appropriate forum (see, Roman v Sunshine Ranchettes, 98 AD2d 744). This is not an action between Canadian residents and corporations; defendant Au and two other occupants of the vehicle reside in Hong Kong. Further, contrary to defendants’ contention, the fact that the motor vehicle accident occurred in New York is not the only connection with this State. The State Trooper who investigated the accident and the numerous medical experts who treated plaintiff during his month-long hospital stay in this State are material witnesses (see, Moschera v Muraca, 148 AD2d 591) and may not be amenable to process in the Province of Ontario. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rath, Jr., J.—Dismiss Action.) Present—Pine, J. P., Lawton, Fallon, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
233 A.D.2d 850, 649 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chi-chu-v-surgenor-national-leasing-ltd-nyappdiv-1996.