Chewning v. Smyth

365 U.S. 832
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 6, 1961
DocketNo. 276
StatusPublished

This text of 365 U.S. 832 (Chewning v. Smyth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chewning v. Smyth, 365 U.S. 832 (1961).

Opinion

Motion to substitute W. K. Cunningham, Jr. in place of W. Frank Smyth, Jr. as the party respondent granted. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia granted. Case transferred to the appellate docket.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
365 U.S. 832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chewning-v-smyth-scotus-1961.