Chewning, Jr. v. Pollak

Supreme Court of Florida

Chewning, Jr. v. Pollak

7 So. 2d 4, 149 Fla. 544, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 832

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedFebruary 20, 1942

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 So. 2d 4 (Chewning, Jr. v. Pollak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chewning, Jr. v. Pollak, 7 So. 2d 4, 149 Fla. 544, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 832 (Fla. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

A motion is made to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that it “was not taken within the time required by law.”

A final decree dismissing the bill of complaint on final hearing on bill, answer and testimony was filed June 4, 1941, and recorded June 5, 1941. An appeal from the final decree was filed October 28, 1941, and recorded October 29, 1941.

*545 As such appeal was taken less than six months after the entry of the final decree and less than sixty days from October 1, 1941, it was duly taken within the time required by Chapter 20441, Acts of 1941, as interpreted by this Court in Harkins v. Atlantic National Bank of Jacksonville, filed January 5, 1942, and De Bowes, v. De Bowes, City of Miami Beach v. G. A. P. Company, Scott v. Wellacott, Beaty v. Inlet Beach, filed at this term.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied.

BROWN, C. J„ WHITFIELD, BUFORD, and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI