Chewens v. Newburgh Central School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chewens v. Newburgh Central School District

278 A.D.2d 414, 718 N.Y.S.2d 613, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13194

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 18, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 278 A.D.2d 414 (Chewens v. Newburgh Central School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chewens v. Newburgh Central School District, 278 A.D.2d 414, 718 N.Y.S.2d 613, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13194 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7511 to vacate an arbitration award dated January 31, 2000, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), dated April 11, 2000, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the Hearing Officer did not make any findings based on uncharged conduct (see, Matter of Block v Ambach, 73 NY2d 323, 332). Moreover, the award was final and definite (see, CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [in]; Matter of Meisels v Uhr, 79 NY2d 526, 536). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the petition. Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7511 to vacate an arbitration award dated January 31, 2000, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.), dated April 11, 2000, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the Hearing Officer did not make any findings based on uncharged conduct (see, Matter of Block v Ambach, 73 NY2d 323, 332). Moreover, the award was final and definite (see, CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [in]; Matter of Meisels v Uhr, 79 NY2d 526, 536). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the petition. Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 A.D.2d 414, 718 N.Y.S.2d 613, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chewens-v-newburgh-central-school-district-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack