Chew Chong Tai v. United States
This text of 24 Cust. Ct. 475 (Chew Chong Tai v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decisions cited, the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) Kumquats similar to those the subject of United States v. Fung Chong Co. (34 C. C. P. A. 40, C. A. D. 342) were held dutiable at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 743 as oranges; (2) joss stick or joss light the same as the merchandise involved in Abstract 34216 was held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1703; and (3) articles the same as those passed upon in Rolls Razor, Inc. v. United States (6 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 480) and Abstract 51306 were held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as nonenumerated manufactured articles.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 Cust. Ct. 475, 1950 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chew-chong-tai-v-united-states-cusc-1950.