Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. First Citizens Premises Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. First Citizens Premises Co.

816 So. 2d 1124, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1785, 2002 WL 237658

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 20, 2002

DocketNo. 4D01-1242

StatusPublished

This text of 816 So. 2d 1124 (Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. First Citizens Premises Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. First Citizens Premises Co., 816 So. 2d 1124, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1785, 2002 WL 237658 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

STONE, J.

We affirm a final judgment finding Chevron U.S.A., Inc. in breach of a purchase and sale agreement that it entered into with First Citizens Premises Company, Inc.

The trial court did not err, as a matter of law, in determining that a latent ambiguity existed in the contract which rendered its application uncertain. See Bd. of Trs. of Internal Improvement Trust Fund v. Lost Tree Vill. Corp., 805 So.2d 22 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)(holding that the existence of an ambiguity is a question of law and the ambiguity must then be resolved as a question of fact). We also find no error in the trial court’s resolution of the ambiguity as it was supported by competent, substantial evidence. See Dinallo v. Gunster, Yoakley, Valdes-Fauli & Stewart, P.A., 768 So.2d 468, 471 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)(holding that where there is an ambiguity in the contract, the trial court’s interpretation of contract will be affirmed if supported by competent substantial evidence).

We do not address the general applicability of section 376.308(5), Florida Statutes (1997), in that we conclude the statute has no effect on the pre-existing agreement between the two parties. See Hassen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 674 So.2d 106, 108 (Fla.1996)(holding that in the absence of clear legislative intent to the contrary, an enactment that affects substantive rights or creates new obligations or liabilities is presumed to apply prospectively).

As to all other issues we find no error or abuse of discretion and affirm.

POLEN, C.J. and STEVENSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STONE, J.

We affirm a final judgment finding Chevron U.S.A., Inc. in breach of a purchase and sale agreement that it entered into with First Citizens Premises Company, Inc.

The trial court did not err, as a matter of law, in determining that a latent ambiguity existed in the contract which rendered its application uncertain. See Bd. of Trs. of Internal Improvement Trust Fund v. Lost Tree Vill. Corp., 805 So.2d 22 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)(holding that the existence of an ambiguity is a question of law and the ambiguity must then be resolved as a question of fact). We also find no error in the trial court’s resolution of the ambiguity as it was supported by competent, substantial evidence. See Dinallo v. Gunster, Yoakley, Valdes-Fauli & Stewart, P.A., 768 So.2d 468, 471 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)(holding that where there is an ambiguity in the contract, the trial court’s interpretation of contract will be affirmed if supported by competent substantial evidence).

We do not address the general applicability of section 376.308(5), Florida Statutes (1997), in that we conclude the statute has no effect on the pre-existing agreement between the two parties. See Hassen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 674 So.2d 106, 108 (Fla.1996)(holding that in the absence of clear legislative intent to the contrary, an enactment that affects substantive rights or creates new obligations or liabilities is presumed to apply prospectively).

As to all other issues we find no error or abuse of discretion and affirm.

POLEN, C.J. and STEVENSON, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

816 So. 2d 1124, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1785, 2002 WL 237658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chevron-usa-inc-v-first-citizens-premises-co-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack