Chevron Usa, Inc. v. Bronster

Ninth Circuit

Chevron Usa, Inc. v. Bronster

415 F.3d 1027, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 14321

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 15, 2005

Docket02-15867

StatusPublished

This text of 415 F.3d 1027 (Chevron Usa, Inc. v. Bronster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chevron Usa, Inc. v. Bronster, 415 F.3d 1027, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 14321 (9th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

415 F.3d 1027

CHEVRON USA, INC., a Pennsylvania Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Margery S. BRONSTER, Attorney General of the State of Hawaii, Defendant, and
Linda Lingle, Governor of the State of Hawaii; Mark J. Bennetti, Attorney General of the State of Hawaii, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 02-15867.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 15, 2005.

Saul D. Bercovitch, Esq., Albert J. Boro, John Myrdal, Pillbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman LLP, San Francisco, CA, Robert A. Mittelstaedt, Esq., Stanton, Clay, Chapman, Crumpton & Iwamura, Honolulu, HI, Craig E. Stewart, Esq., Jones Day, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert G. Dreher, Esq., Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellants.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.

Before D.W. NELSON, BEEZER, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

In conformance with the mandate of the Supreme Court, we remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the United States Supreme Court. See ___ U.S. ___, 125 S.Ct. 2074, ___ L.Ed.2d ___ (2005).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI