Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. v. BJ Services Co.
This text of 79 F. App'x 432 (Chevron Phillips Chemical Co. v. BJ Services Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
B J Services Company moves without opposition to dismiss Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, LP’s appeal because the order from which Chevron Phillips appeals is not a final judgment.
On September 17, 2003, this court directed Chevron Phillips to show cause why its appeal should not be dismissed as premature. Chevron Phillips has not responded. However, BJ Service’s states that the parties agree: “Although the July 2, 2003 order was styled as a final judgment, the District Court did not make the certification required by [Fed.R.Civ.P.] 54(b) and has not yet disposed of all the claims and counterclaims at issue in this case.” Under these circumstances, this court lacks jurisdiction to review the present appeal. See Pandrol USA LP v. Airboss Ry. Prods., Inc. 320 F.3d 1354, 1362 (Fed.Cir.2003) (stating that if any party’s claims are not fully adjudicated, there is no final decision and, therefore, no jurisdiction in this court).
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion to dismiss is granted.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
We note that it is not the practice of this court to dismiss an appeal with or without prejudice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 F. App'x 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chevron-phillips-chemical-co-v-bj-services-co-cafc-2003.