Chevrolet Co. v. . Holder

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Chevrolet Co. v. . Holder

8 S.E.2d 239, 217 N.C. 794, 1940 N.C. LEXIS 349

DecidedApril 10, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 8 S.E.2d 239 (Chevrolet Co. v. . Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chevrolet Co. v. . Holder, 8 S.E.2d 239, 217 N.C. 794, 1940 N.C. LEXIS 349 (N.C. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

From judgment on verdict in favor of defendant J. C. Edmisten, plaintiff appealed. Plaintiff instituted action on a note which it was alleged defendant J. C. Edmisten had endorsed. This defendant denied that he had endorsed the note, or authorized anyone to sign his name thereto. The jury accepted the defendant's version of the transaction and rendered verdict in his favor. On the record, we find no ruling of the court below which would justify setting aside the verdict and judgment. The plaintiff's assignments of error cannot be sustained.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

From judgment on verdict in favor of defendant J. C. Edmisten, plaintiff appealed. Plaintiff instituted action on a note which it was alleged defendant J. C. Edmisten had endorsed. This defendant denied that he had endorsed the note, or authorized anyone to sign his name thereto. The jury accepted the defendant's version of the transaction and rendered verdict in his favor. On the record, we find no ruling of the court below which would justify setting aside the verdict and judgment. The plaintiff's assignments of error cannot be sustained.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 S.E.2d 239, 217 N.C. 794, 1940 N.C. LEXIS 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chevrolet-co-v-holder-nc-1940.