Chevallier v. Whitaker
8 Tex. 204
Opinion
In this case there was no assignment of error, as required by law. The appellee argues some of the questions raised on the exceptions taken in the court below, but presents also the ground that errors in the judgment, for want of assignment, have been waived. This may be considered'‘as a motion on his part to dismiss for the want, of an assignment of errors, and this is accordingly granted.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chevallier v. Whitaker, 8 Tex. 204 (Tex. 1852).
8 Tex. 204 (Chevallier v. Whitaker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wolfley v. Gila River Irrigation Co.
24 P. 257 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1890)
Putnam v. Putnam
24 P. 320 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1890)
Pfeuffer v. Strumpel
1 Tex. L. R. 412 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1882)
Thompson v. Rice
49 Tex. 769 (Texas Supreme Court, 1878)