Chevaillier v. Denson
8 Tex. 439
Opinion
The only ground for error relied on is the refusal of the court to grant a new trial.
The question submitted to tiie jury was one of fact. It became their duty to decide in a conflict of testimony. It was their peculiar and exclusive province to decide upon tiio credibility of the witnesses and tiio weight of evidence. In such a case it is well settled that the judgment of the District Court refusing a new trial will not be reversed on the ground that tiie verdict was contrary to the evidence. Tiie judgment is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chevaillier v. Denson, 8 Tex. 439 (Tex. 1852).
8 Tex. 439 (Chevaillier v. Denson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Johnson
31 S.W. 255 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1895)
G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. Holt
1 White & W. 477 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1883)
Merriwether v. Dixon
28 Tex. 15 (Texas Supreme Court, 1866)