Chevaillier v. Brewer

6 Tex. 398
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1851
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 6 Tex. 398 (Chevaillier v. Brewer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chevaillier v. Brewer, 6 Tex. 398 (Tex. 1851).

Opinion

Whbblek, ,J.

We might feel ourselves justified in striking this appeal from the docket upon the principle of the ihaxim “De minimis non curat lex." A case presenting so striking a picture of causelessly-protracted, vexatious and -frivolous litigation has seldom been presented for tlie revision of a court of last resort.

In looking into the facts of the case, which detail a controversy too frivolous for repetition, we find the testimony conflicting. The conclusion to he drawn from it, therefore, as to tlie facts, was a question exclusively for the jury. In such a case we have uniformly refused to disturb tlie verdict. It was for siightly less than tlie judgment of tlie justice; but no presumption is thereby raised, under tlie circumstances, that his judgment was correct. We see no cause to be dissatisfied with the verdict. Tlie'judgment upon it is legal and correct.

There does not appear to have been tlie slightest ground for the appeal to this court, and it is time to put an end to this frivolous and vexatious controversy. Tlie judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. L. Wolff Mfg. Co. of Texas
225 S.W. 212 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Tex. 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chevaillier-v-brewer-tex-1851.