Chetty Mamandur v. Jimmy Earl Power Jr.

73 F. App'x 902
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 27, 2003
Docket02-3898
StatusUnpublished

This text of 73 F. App'x 902 (Chetty Mamandur v. Jimmy Earl Power Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chetty Mamandur v. Jimmy Earl Power Jr., 73 F. App'x 902 (8th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Chetty and Uma Sunku Mamandur appeal the district court’s 1 order denying their motion to vacate an arbitration award, and confirming the award in favor of Jimmy Earl Power, Jr., and Prudential Securities Incorporated. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, and we conclude that the court did not err in not holding an evidentiary hearing. Cf. Burton v. Dormire, 295 F.3d 839, 848 (8th Cir.2002) (declining to remand for hearing because arguments lacked merit and hear *903 ing was legally unnecessary), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 123 S.Ct. 1904, 155 L.Ed.2d 831 (2003). We also deny the Mamandurs’ pending motion for remand. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Darryl Burton v. David Dormire, Jeremiah Nixon
295 F.3d 839 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 F. App'x 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chetty-mamandur-v-jimmy-earl-power-jr-ca8-2003.