Chetty Mamandur v. Jimmy Earl Power Jr.
This text of 73 F. App'x 902 (Chetty Mamandur v. Jimmy Earl Power Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Chetty and Uma Sunku Mamandur appeal the district court’s 1 order denying their motion to vacate an arbitration award, and confirming the award in favor of Jimmy Earl Power, Jr., and Prudential Securities Incorporated. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, and we conclude that the court did not err in not holding an evidentiary hearing. Cf. Burton v. Dormire, 295 F.3d 839, 848 (8th Cir.2002) (declining to remand for hearing because arguments lacked merit and hear *903 ing was legally unnecessary), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 123 S.Ct. 1904, 155 L.Ed.2d 831 (2003). We also deny the Mamandurs’ pending motion for remand. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 F. App'x 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chetty-mamandur-v-jimmy-earl-power-jr-ca8-2003.