Chettiar v. Department of Professional Regulation

619 So. 2d 28, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6162, 1993 WL 191950
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 8, 1993·No. No. 92-1991·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the respondent Thi-rumalaiswamy Chettiar from a final administrative order revoking his nursing license. Finding no abuse of discretion in the denial of the motion for continuance made on the day of the hearing, see, e.g., Padgett v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n of Santa Rosa County, 378 So.2d 58, 62-63 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Buckley Towers Condominium, Inc. v. Buchwald, 340 So.2d 1206, 1208 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert, denied, 348 So.2d 945 (Fla.1977); Carol City Util., Inc. v. Gaines Constr. Co., 201 So.2d 242, 244 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967), cert, denied, 210 So.2d 221 (Fla.1968); McWhorter v. McWhorter, 122 So.2d 504 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960); Fla.Admin.Code R. 221-6.017 (now 60Q-2.107), or in the failure of the hearing officer to appoint counsel for the respondent, see, e.g., Potashnick v. Port City Constr. Co., 609 F.2d 1101, 1108 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 820, 101 S.Ct. 78, 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980), Woodham v. Williams, 207 So.2d 320 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968), the final order under review is, in all respects,

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chettiar v. Department of Professional Regulation, 619 So. 2d 28, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6162, 1993 WL 191950 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

619 So. 2d 28 (Chettiar v. Department of Professional Regulation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woodham v. Williams
207 So. 2d 320 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Carol City Utilities, Inc. v. Gaines Construction Co.
201 So. 2d 242 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Buckley Towers Condominium, Inc. v. Buchwald
340 So. 2d 1206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
McWhorter v. McWhorter
122 So. 2d 504 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Padgett v. First Federal S & L Ass'n
378 So. 2d 58 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)