Chestosky v. Wolf Run Coal Co.

106 Ohio St. (N.S.) 122
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 12, 1922
DocketNos. 17154 and 17155
StatusPublished

This text of 106 Ohio St. (N.S.) 122 (Chestosky v. Wolf Run Coal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chestosky v. Wolf Run Coal Co., 106 Ohio St. (N.S.) 122 (Ohio 1922).

Opinions

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgments of the said court of appeals be, and the same are hereby, affirmed. Four members of the court concur in the judgments but inasmuch as the judges who concur are not agreed upon the grounds of affirmance no authoritative majority opinion setting forth the reasons of the judgments is filed in the cases. The view of individual judges may however be stated in separate opinions.

Judgments affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur. [123]*123Wanamaker, J., dissents. Clark, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 Ohio St. (N.S.) 122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chestosky-v-wolf-run-coal-co-ohio-1922.