Chestosky v. Wolf Run Coal Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Chestosky v. Wolf Run Coal Co.

106 Ohio St. (N.S.) 122

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 12, 1922·No. Nos. 17154 and 17155·Published

Opinions

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgments of the said court of appeals be, and the same are hereby, affirmed. Four members of the court concur in the judgments but inasmuch as the judges who concur are not agreed upon the grounds of affirmance no authoritative majority opinion setting forth the reasons of the judgments is filed in the cases. The view of individual judges may however be stated in separate opinions.

Judgments affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur. [123]*123Wanamaker, J., dissents. Clark, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgments of the said court of appeals be, and the same are hereby, affirmed. Four members of the court concur in the judgments but inasmuch as the judges who concur are not agreed upon the grounds of affirmance no authoritative majority opinion setting forth the reasons of the judgments is filed in the cases. The view of individual judges may however be stated in separate opinions.

Judgments affirmed.

Marshall, C. J., Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur. [123]*123Wanamaker, J., dissents. Clark, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Chestosky v. Wolf Run Coal Co., 106 Ohio St. (N.S.) 122 (Ohio 1922).

Pincite

106 Ohio St. (N.S.) 122 (Chestosky v. Wolf Run Coal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.