Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Chestnut v. State

Chestnut v. State

586 So. 2d 101, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 15185, 1991 WL 193341
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chestnut v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 578 So. 2d 27 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 2, 1991·No. No. 91-1096·Published

Opinion

UPON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner’s motion for rehearing is denied but we substitute the following for our original opinion.

[102]*102We dismiss Chestnut’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus without prejudice to his filing motions in the circuit court, under Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 8.111 and 3.800(a), for appointment of counsel and correction of a sentence which petitioner alleges is illegal.

ANSTEAD, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chestnut v. State, 586 So. 2d 101, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 15185, 1991 WL 193341 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

586 So. 2d 101 (Chestnut v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.