Chestnut v. State

452 So. 2d 1125, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14330
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 17, 1984·No. No. 84-98·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court did not err in giving the jury an instruction on “principals” after closing arguments, even though the instruction had not been requested at the charge conference. See Jacobs v. State, 396 So.2d 713 (Fla.1981).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chestnut v. State, 452 So. 2d 1125, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 14330 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

452 So. 2d 1125 (Chestnut v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Evans v. State
985 So. 2d 1105 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Pisegna v. State
488 So. 2d 624 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)