Chestnut v. New York Consolidated Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chestnut v. New York Consolidated Railroad

168 A.D. 960, 153 N.Y.S. 1110

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1915·Published

Opinion

The parties hereto having stipulated in open court that this case may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows: Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, by reason of the charge at folio 184, inasmuch as it seems to withdraw from the jury consideration of the causes of the sign falling which were submitted to the jury in the main charge. At least the jury may have been led to such conclusion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The parties hereto having stipulated in open court that this case may be disposed of by a court of four, the decision is as follows: Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, by reason of the charge at folio 184, inasmuch as it seems to withdraw from the jury consideration of the causes of the sign falling which were submitted to the jury in the main charge. At least the jury may have been led to such conclusion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Chestnut v. New York Consolidated Railroad, 168 A.D. 960, 153 N.Y.S. 1110 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

168 A.D. 960 (Chestnut v. New York Consolidated Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.