Chestnut v. Brown

Fourth Circuit

Chestnut v. Brown

444 F. App'x 677

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 30, 2011·No. No. 11-6676·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Craig Latwain Chestnut appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and conclude there is no reversible error. Accordingly, we af[678]*678firm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chestnut v. Brown, No. 3:10-cv-01784-RMG, 2011 WL 1543301 (D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Craig Latwain Chestnut appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and conclude there is no reversible error. Accordingly, we af[678]*678firm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chestnut v. Brown, No. 3:10-cv-01784-RMG, 2011 WL 1543301 (D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Chestnut v. Brown, 444 F. App'x 677 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

444 F. App'x 677 (Chestnut v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related