Chestney v. Coon
8 Johns. 150
This text of 8 Johns. 150 (Chestney v. Coon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chestney v. Coon, 8 Johns. 150 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1811).
Opinion
The evidence was sufficient to support the judgment. The plaintiff below went, as it appears, to Watson’s grist mill to get his grain ground, and for no other purpose, and he generally went there when he could not have it ground in his own town. The j udgKtent must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Price v. Hickok
39 Vt. 292 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1866)
Hunt's Heirs v. Ellison's Heirs
32 Ala. 173 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1858)
Skinner v. Anderson
12 Barb. 648 (New York Supreme Court, 1852)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
8 Johns. 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chestney-v-coon-nysupct-1811.