Chestney v. Coon
8 Johns. 150
Opinion
The evidence was sufficient to support the judgment. The plaintiff below went, as it appears, to Watson’s grist mill to get his grain ground, and for no other purpose, and he generally went there when he could not have it ground in his own town. The j udgKtent must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chestney v. Coon, 8 Johns. 150 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1811).
8 Johns. 150 (Chestney v. Coon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Price v. Hickok
39 Vt. 292 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1866)
Hunt's Heirs v. Ellison's Heirs
32 Ala. 173 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1858)
Skinner v. Anderson
12 Barb. 648 (New York Supreme Court, 1852)