Chesterfield Homes, Inc. v. City of New York

92 A.D.2d 578, 459 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16827
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 22, 1983·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— In an action to declare the unconstitutionality of a resolution and map adopted by the Board of Estimate of the City of New York and to recover damages for the alleged taking of plaintiff’s property without just compensation, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rubin, J.), dated July 28, 1981, which declared that the map and resolution are constitutional and dismissed the portion of the complaint [579]*579seeking damages. Judgment modified, on the law, by striking the first and second decretal paragraphs and substituting therefor a provision that the complaint is dismissed in its entirety. As so modified, judgment affirmed, with costs to the respondent. Plaintiff’s claims were previously determined in a CPLR article 78 proceeding, and the instant action is therefore barred by the doctrine of res judicata in the sense of claim preclusion (Restatement, Judgments 2d, §§ 24, 25). Titone, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chesterfield Homes, Inc. v. City of New York, 92 A.D.2d 578, 459 N.Y.S.2d 463, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16827 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

92 A.D.2d 578 (Chesterfield Homes, Inc. v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heritage Hills Sewage Works Corp. v. Town Board of Somers
245 A.D.2d 450 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Village of Johnson City v. Bolas
157 A.D.2d 1009 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)