Chester v. United States Department of State

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided June 27, 2024·No. 3:23-cv-05367·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA JASON PAUL CHESTER, CASE NO. 3:23-cv-05367-DGE Plaintiff, ORDER ON REFERRAL (DKT. NO. v. 70) STATE et al., Defendants. This matter comes before the Court as a referral notice filed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3) for the limited purpose of determining whether Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status should continue for his appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. (Dkt. No. 70.) An appeal is taken in “good faith” where it seeks review of at least one issue or claim that is found to be “non-frivolous.” Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002). An issue is “frivolous” where it “lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.” Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). The Court concludes Plaintiff’s appeal is frivolous because it lacks an arguable basis in law. For the reasons articulated in the order on the motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 66) and as demonstrated in the record, Plaintiff’s claims are either moot or fail to state a claim. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status should NOT continue on appeal.

The Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

DATED this 27th day of June 2024. A

David G. Estudillo United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chester v. United States Department of State, (W.D. Wash. 2024).

Chester v. United States Department of State (Chester v. United States Department of State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neitzke v. Williams
490 U.S. 319 (Supreme Court, 1989)