Chester v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System

209 A.D.2d 815, 618 N.Y.S.2d 482, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11088
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 10, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 209 A.D.2d 815 (Chester v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chester v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System, 209 A.D.2d 815, 618 N.Y.S.2d 482, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11088 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller which denied petitioner’s request for disability retirement benefits.

Petitioner was employed by the Department of Motor Vehicles when, on September 6, 1989, she slipped while descending the office stairs and sustained injuries. Petitioner subsequently filed for disability retirement benefits. Finding that petitioner had not established that her injuries were caused by an accident within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law § 605, respondent Comptroller ultimately denied the application. We conclude that there is substantial evidence in the record to support this determination. There is conflicting evidence concerning whether petitioner fell because she simply took a misstep or because she slipped on computer paper left on the stairs. Issues of credibility are properly resolved by the Comptroller. Under the circumstances of this case, the Comptroller rationally concluded that petitioner’s injuries [816]*816were sustained as a result of her own misstep and not because of an accident.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White and Peters, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zajdowicz v. New York State & Local Police & Fire Retirement System
267 A.D.2d 863 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Spencer v. New York State & Local Employees' Retirement System
220 A.D.2d 792 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 A.D.2d 815, 618 N.Y.S.2d 482, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11088, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chester-v-new-york-state-local-employees-retirement-system-nyappdiv-1994.