Chester v. King
2 N.J. Eq. 405
This text of 2 N.J. Eq. 405 (Chester v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chester v. King, 2 N.J. Eq. 405 (N.J. Ct. App. 1841).
Opinion
The mortgagor who has parted with the ¡equity of redemption is not a necessary party to a bill for foreclosure ; but if the complainant thinks proper to make him a party, ihe has a right so to do, and the bill is not demurrable for that .cause. He is a proper party, although not an indispensable one.
Demurrer overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 N.J. Eq. 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chester-v-king-njch-1841.