Chester Rolling-Mills v. Hopatcong

New York Supreme Court

Chester Rolling-Mills v. Hopatcong

16 N.Y.S. 825, 41 N.Y. St. Rep. 472

DecidedDecember 14, 1891

StatusPublished

This text of 16 N.Y.S. 825 (Chester Rolling-Mills v. Hopatcong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chester Rolling-Mills v. Hopatcong, 16 N.Y.S. 825, 41 N.Y. St. Rep. 472 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Pratt, J.

These proceedings are based upon the act of 1862,¹ and the allowances from which these appeals are brought were such as were authorized [826]*826by that act. The costs and allowances granted by that act were not set forth bodily in the statute. They were incorporated into it by reference to the Code of Procedure then in existence, and became a portion of the act as effectually as if they had been set forth in words. The subsequent repeal of the Code of Procedure did not affect the act of 1862. That stands as it did before. The allowances made were therefore proper, and are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pratt, J.

These proceedings are based upon the act of 1862,¹ and the allowances from which these appeals are brought were such as were authorized [826]*826by that act. The costs and allowances granted by that act were not set forth bodily in the statute. They were incorporated into it by reference to the Code of Procedure then in existence, and became a portion of the act as effectually as if they had been set forth in words. The subsequent repeal of the Code of Procedure did not affect the act of 1862. That stands as it did before. The allowances made were therefore proper, and are affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 N.Y.S. 825, 41 N.Y. St. Rep. 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chester-rolling-mills-v-hopatcong-nysupct-1891.