Chester James Doles v. William L. Smith, Warden Officer Williams

56 F.3d 61, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19087, 1995 WL 321291
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 30, 1995
Docket95-6291
StatusPublished

This text of 56 F.3d 61 (Chester James Doles v. William L. Smith, Warden Officer Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chester James Doles v. William L. Smith, Warden Officer Williams, 56 F.3d 61, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19087, 1995 WL 321291 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

56 F.3d 61
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Chester James DOLES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
William L. SMITH, Warden; Officer Williams, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6291.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 30, 1995.

Chester James Doles, appellant pro se. Stephanie Judith LaneWeber, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baltimore, MD, for appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's report and recommendation considering Appellant's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (1988); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 F.3d 61, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19087, 1995 WL 321291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chester-james-doles-v-william-l-smith-warden-offic-ca4-1995.