Chester City v. Pennsylvania
This text of 134 U.S. 240 (Chester City v. Pennsylvania) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CHESTER CITY
v.
PENNSYLVANIA.
Supreme Court of United States.
Mr. James W.M. Newlin for the plaintiff in error.
Mr. William S. Kirkpatrick and Mr. John F. Sanderson for defendant in error.
Mr. M.E. Olmsted and Mr. Wayne McVeagh, on behalf of W.W. Jennings, plaintiff in error in No. 1242; Mr. W.B. Lamberton and Mr. George R. Krcher, on behalf of the North Pennsylvania Railroad Company, defendant in error in No. 1556; and Mr. M.E. Olmsted, on behalf of the Delaware Division Canal Company.
MR. JUSTICE BRADLEY delivered the opinion of the court.
This case, so far as any federal question is concerned, is similar, in all substantial respects, to that of Bell's Gap Railroad Co. v. Pennsylvania, just decided, and must be governed by the decision in that case.
The motion to dismiss the writ of error is denied, and the judgment of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
134 U.S. 240, 10 S. Ct. 536, 33 L. Ed. 896, 1890 U.S. LEXIS 1964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chester-city-v-pennsylvania-scotus-1890.