Chester City v. Pennsylvania
134 U.S. 240
Opinion
Motions were made in this case similar to those made in Bell’s Gap Railroad Co. v. Pennsylvania. Mr. Justice Bradley delivered the opinion of the court. This case, so far as any federal 'question is concerned, is similar, in all substantial respects; to that of Bell’s Gap Railroad Co. v. Pennsylvania, just decided, and' must be governed by the decision in that case. ■
The motion to dismiss the writ of error is denied, and the judgment of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chester City v. Pennsylvania, 134 U.S. 240 (1890).
134 U.S. 240 (Chester City v. Pennsylvania) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.