Chessey v. City of New York

88 A.D.3d 625, 931 N.Y.2d 502
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 27, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 88 A.D.3d 625 (Chessey v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chessey v. City of New York, 88 A.D.3d 625, 931 N.Y.2d 502 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

The City concedes that in light of the Court of Appeals’ decision in Kabir v County of Monroe (16 NY3d 217 [2011]), it was error to charge the jury with the “emergency doctrine.” It was undisputed that the driver of the City’s vehicle involved in the accident was not “involved in an emergency operation” or “ engage [d] in the specific conduct exempted from the rules of the road by Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1104 (b)” at the time of [626]*626the accident (Kabir at 220). Accordingly, the driver’s conduct “is governed by the principles of ordinary negligence” (id.). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Sweeny, Acosta, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Courtney Anderson v.Commack Fire District
New York Court of Appeals, 2023
Starkman v. City of Long Beach
106 A.D.3d 1076 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 A.D.3d 625, 931 N.Y.2d 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chessey-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2011.