Chessey v. City of New York

88 A.D.3d 625, 931 N.Y.2d 502
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 27, 2011·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The City concedes that in light of the Court of Appeals’ decision in Kabir v County of Monroe (16 NY3d 217 [2011]), it was error to charge the jury with the “emergency doctrine.” It was undisputed that the driver of the City’s vehicle involved in the accident was not “involved in an emergency operation” or “ engage [d] in the specific conduct exempted from the rules of the road by Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1104 (b)” at the time of [626]*626the accident (Kabir at 220). Accordingly, the driver’s conduct “is governed by the principles of ordinary negligence” (id.). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Sweeny, Acosta, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chessey v. City of New York, 88 A.D.3d 625, 931 N.Y.2d 502 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

88 A.D.3d 625 (Chessey v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Courtney Anderson v.Commack Fire District
New York Court of Appeals, 2023
Starkman v. City of Long Beach
106 A.D.3d 1076 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)