Chess v. Chess

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chess v. Chess

7 A.D.2d 912, 183 N.Y.S.2d 114, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10110

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 2, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.D.2d 912 (Chess v. Chess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chess v. Chess, 7 A.D.2d 912, 183 N.Y.S.2d 114, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10110 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by a wife for a separation, the appeal is from so much of an order granting her motion for temporary alimony as limits said alimony to $45 a week. Order modified by striking from the second ordering paragraph the figure “ $45.00 ” and by substituting therefor the figure “ $75.00 ”. As so modified, order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant. The facts do not warrant an award of temporary alimony of less than $75 a week. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by a wife for a separation, the appeal is from so much of an order granting her motion for temporary alimony as limits said alimony to $45 a week. Order modified by striking from the second ordering paragraph the figure “ $45.00 ” and by substituting therefor the figure “ $75.00 ”. As so modified, order insofar as appealed from affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant. The facts do not warrant an award of temporary alimony of less than $75 a week. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.2d 912, 183 N.Y.S.2d 114, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chess-v-chess-nyappdiv-1959.