Chesons Corp. v. City of New York

240 A.D. 858

This text of 240 A.D. 858 (Chesons Corp. v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chesons Corp. v. City of New York, 240 A.D. 858 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs, on the ground that it was a proper exercise of discretion at Special Term in denying plaintiff’s motion to amend its complaint setting up a large sum as additional damages, in view of the long delay (Dickins v. City of New York, 228 App. Div. 853; Gallagher v. Perot, 122 Misc. 845) and the fact that conditions have changed to the prejudice of the rights of defendants in respect to producing proof on the question of damages. (Levy v. Delaware, L. & W. R. R. Co., 211 App. Div. 503.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Levy v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
211 A.D. 503 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)
Dickins v. City of New York
228 A.D. 853 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)
Gallagher v. Perot
122 Misc. 845 (New York Supreme Court, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 A.D. 858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chesons-corp-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1933.