Chesney v. State

663 N.E.2d 1301, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1473
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 8, 1996
Docket96-668
StatusPublished

This text of 663 N.E.2d 1301 (Chesney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chesney v. State, 663 N.E.2d 1301, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1473 (Ohio 1996).

Opinion

In Habeas Corpus. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
663 N.E.2d 1301, 75 Ohio St. 3d 1473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chesney-v-state-ohio-1996.