Home/Fifth Circuit/Chesley Bennie Batson and James Okeven McCurley v. United States

Chesley Bennie Batson and James Okeven McCurley v. United States

304 F.2d 459
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 20, 1962
Docket19521_1
StatusPublished

This text of 304 F.2d 459 (Chesley Bennie Batson and James Okeven McCurley v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chesley Bennie Batson and James Okeven McCurley v. United States, 304 F.2d 459 (5th Cir. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The record discloses that in this Motion to Vacate Judgment under 28 U.S. C.A. § 2255, the appellants in open court orally and in writing waive all of the matters touching on arraignment, the indictment by grand jury, venue and appointment of counsel. The trial court therefore properly dismissed the petition without a hearing.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Federal custody; remedies on motion attacking sentence
28 U.S.C. § 2255

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
304 F.2d 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chesley-bennie-batson-and-james-okeven-mccurley-v-united-states-ca5-1962.