Cheshire v. Wright

90 S.E.2d 687, 243 N.C. 441, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 340
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 13, 1956
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 90 S.E.2d 687 (Cheshire v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cheshire v. Wright, 90 S.E.2d 687, 243 N.C. 441, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 340 (N.C. 1956).

Opinion

Pee CtjRiam.

The jury, under application of settled principles of law, resolved the issues of fact against the defendants. While the appellant’s well-prepared brief presents contentions involving fine distinctions and close differentiations, a careful examination of the assignments of error discloses no new question or feature requiring extended discussion. Neither reversible nor prejudicial error has been made to appear. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ingram v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
129 S.E.2d 222 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Hayes v. City of Wilmington
91 S.E.2d 673 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 S.E.2d 687, 243 N.C. 441, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheshire-v-wright-nc-1956.