Cheshire v. . Drewry

197 S.E. 1, 213 N.C. 450, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 111
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMay 4, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 197 S.E. 1 (Cheshire v. . Drewry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cheshire v. . Drewry, 197 S.E. 1, 213 N.C. 450, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 111 (N.C. 1938).

Opinion

Schenck, J.

This is an action instituted by the plaintiffs, as substituted trustees under the will of John C. Drewry, Sr., wherein they pray “That because of the death of John 0. Drewry before he had attained the age of 35 years the plaintiffs are uncertain of their duties as trustees under the said will and of the proper distribution of the assets of the trusts of which they are trustees if the same, or any part thereof, are now distributable, and they therefore pray the court for the construction of said will and an adjudication of the true meaning thereof, and particularly for the advice and instruction of the court upon the following questions: (a) What duty, if any, have the trustees with respect to the ‘Times Building’ referred to in Item III of the will? (b) Has the $30,000 trust in favor of John C. Drewry now terminated? And (1) if so, to whom is the fund payable; (2) if not, to whom is the income payable, and for how long a time? (c) Has the residue trust terminated? And (1) if so, to whom is the fund payable; (2) if not, to whom is the income payable, and for how long a time? (d) Has the residue trust terminated in part only? And (1) if.so, what part has terminated and to whom is that part payable; (2) what part has not terminated and to whom is the income therefrom payable, and for how long a time? (e) What provision should be made to provide the monthly payment of $15.00 per month to Mattie A. Mangum? (f) Upon dissent from the will of John C. Drewry, Sr., by Kittie Holt Drewry, did the $60,000 trust in her favor become a part of the residue trust? (g) To whom is the income from the residue trust fund and the $30,000 insurance trust fund, received or accrued at the time of the death of John O. Drewry, now payable?”

John C. Drewry, Sr., died 2 October, 1916, leaving surviving him his widow, Kittie Holt Drewry, his son, John C. Drewry, and grandson, James G. Hanes, Jr.

John C. Drewry married Mary Hardy and died on 12 September, 1937, twelve days prior to the 34th anniversary of his birth, leaving surviving him his widow Mary Hardy Drewry and two children, Mary Holt Drewry and John C. Drewry, Jr., aged about 12 and 5 years, respectively.

James G. Hanes, Jr., is now just past 21 years of age, and is unmarried.

*453 Mrs. Kittie Holt Drewry, widow of John 0. Drewry, Sr., dissented from the will of her husband and has been allotted her dower in his real estate and has received her distributive share of his personal property, the building and storehouse on Hargett Street, between Fayetteville and Wilmington streets, in the city of Raleigh, known as the “Times Building” (mentioned in Item III of the will of John 0. Drewry, Sr.), having been allotted as her dower.

John C. Drewry left a will wherein he devised and bequeathed all of his real and personal property to his wife, Mary Hardy Drewry, and, upon failure of the executors therein named to qualify, his widow, Mary Hardy Drewry, was duly appointed and qualified as his administratrix c. t. a.

A. L. Purrington, Jr., was duly appointed guardian ad liiem, of Mary Holt Drewry and John 0. Drewry, Jr., infant children of John 0. Drewry.

John H. Duncan was duly appointed guardian ad litem of the unborn children of James G. Hanes, Jr.

The provisions for specific legacies made in the will of John C. Drewry, Sr., have been carried out, and the trusts therein provided have been set up and have been functioning since the death of the testator, with the exception of the trust for the benefit of the widow, Mrs. Kittie Holt Drewry.

The portions of the will of John C. Drewry, Sr., germane to this action are as follows:

“Item III. I give, bequeath and devise to my wife, Kittie Holt Drewry, for and during her lifetime, the net income from my building and storehouse in the city of Raleigh, situated on the south side of Hargett Street, between Fayetteville and Wilmington streets, Raleigh, N. C., known as the Times Building, and direct my Trustee to pay the same to her quarterly. After her death, I direct my Trustee to convey this property to my son, John C. Drewry, Jr., if he be then alive. If he predeceased my wife, or dies without issue surviving, then I direct that this property be divided among my heirs at law. . . .
“Item IY. I give and bequeath to my son John C. Drewry, ‘now junior,’ who has been a good boy all of his life and who has been a great joy to us, all and every one of my several tracts of land lying and being situate in House Creek Township, Wake County, free of debt — if any mortgage is on the farm at my death, I want it paid off out of my estate — to have and to hold during his lifetime, and then to be divided equally among his male heirs, they to share and share alike. These tracts or parcels of land consist of the one purchased from Miss Rebecca Rogers and others, and contains 125 acres, more or less. Also the tract purchased from Ed Rogers and wife, containing 56 acres, more or less, and two purchased from Allan Rogers and wife, one containing 11 acres, *454 and tbe others 19 acres, more or less. Also tbe land purchased from John Moore and wife, fronting on the Raleigh and Oxford Road, containing 45 acres, more or less, and the adjoining tract purchased from James Shaw, containing 30 acres, more or less. Also the tract purchased by R. S. Rogers and myself from J. 0. Freeman, and afterwards purchased by me from R. S. Rogers and wife, and containing 68 acres, more or less. Also the tract purchased at the Commissioner’s sale from one of the heirs of Burke Rogers, containing 26 acres, more or less. All of these tracts together containing about 400 acres. It is my desire that my son, John C. Drewry, Jr., shall keep this land during his lifetime, and then divide it equally among his male heirs if he has any, as I want this property to remain in the family, and be known as Drewry Hill Farm. If he has no male heirs, then I desire that it shall be divided equally among the female heirs. Should the said John 0. Drewry, Jr., die without issue or without any children then living, the property herein given shall revert to my estate and it or its proceeds become a part of the general trust fund hereinafter provided for.
“Item VI. I give, devise and bequeath to my executor, the Raleigh Savings Bank & Trust Company, whom I hereby constitute and appoint trustee for that purpose, the sum of $120,000.00 for the uses and purposes set out in Paragraphs VII, VIII and IX, and upon the terms and conditions as follows:
“Said trustee shall hold and manage all of said property or the investments into which it may be converted, and receive any income from it, and out of said income to pay the cost and expenses of executing the trust, including any tax or assessment against the trust estate, and pay the net income to the beneficiaries as herein set out.
“Said trustee shall set apart out of the funds and securities in their hands the three separate trusts named in Items 7, 8, and 9.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prevette v. Elsner
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2025
Aberg v. First National Bank in Dallas
450 S.W.2d 403 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1970)
Keesler v. North Carolina National Bank
122 S.E.2d 807 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961)
WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. McEwen
84 S.E.2d 642 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
Blackwood v. Blackwood
76 S.E.2d 122 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Union Nat. Bank of Charlotte v. Easterby
73 S.E.2d 541 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)
American Trust Co. v. Johnson
73 S.E.2d 468 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)
Neill Ex Rel. Neill v. Bach
57 S.E.2d 385 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 S.E. 1, 213 N.C. 450, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cheshire-v-drewry-nc-1938.