Chesbrough v. Chesbrough

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chesbrough v. Chesbrough

57 A.D.2d 1034, 395 N.Y.S.2d 254, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12336

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 26, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 57 A.D.2d 1034 (Chesbrough v. Chesbrough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chesbrough v. Chesbrough, 57 A.D.2d 1034, 395 N.Y.S.2d 254, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12336 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Franklin County, entered November 24, 1976, which reduced a prior support order to $30 per week and further ordered the appellant to pay an additional sum of $5 per week to cover arrearages in the sum of $60. We note that although the incomes and expenses of the parties were comparable at the time of the hearing and both were supporting only themselves, the appellant had sole title to and possession of the marital residence, free of liens and encumbrances. The respondent had worked from the time of her marriage to the appellant in 1949 until their separation in 1976. Upon a review of this record in its entirety we cannot say that the Family Court abused its discretion, upon the appellant’s application for a modification of the previous support order, in only reducing the amount of support from $40 to $30 per week (Family [1035]*1035Ct Act, § 412). Order affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Mahoney and Larkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Franklin County, entered November 24, 1976, which reduced a prior support order to $30 per week and further ordered the appellant to pay an additional sum of $5 per week to cover arrearages in the sum of $60. We note that although the incomes and expenses of the parties were comparable at the time of the hearing and both were supporting only themselves, the appellant had sole title to and possession of the marital residence, free of liens and encumbrances. The respondent had worked from the time of her marriage to the appellant in 1949 until their separation in 1976. Upon a review of this record in its entirety we cannot say that the Family Court abused its discretion, upon the appellant’s application for a modification of the previous support order, in only reducing the amount of support from $40 to $30 per week (Family [1035]*1035Ct Act, § 412). Order affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Mahoney and Larkin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 1034, 395 N.Y.S.2d 254, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chesbrough-v-chesbrough-nyappdiv-1977.