Chesapeake Operating, Inc. v. Samuel Crowder and Jane Crowder

Court of Appeals of Texas

Chesapeake Operating, Inc. v. Samuel Crowder and Jane Crowder

DecidedDecember 9, 2014

Docket02-14-00323-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Chesapeake Operating, Inc. v. Samuel Crowder and Jane Crowder (Chesapeake Operating, Inc. v. Samuel Crowder and Jane Crowder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chesapeake Operating, Inc. v. Samuel Crowder and Jane Crowder, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00323-CV

CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, INC. APPELLANT

V.

SAMUEL CROWDER AND JANE APPELLEES CROWDER

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 2011-008169-3

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

We have considered the “Joint Motion To Set Aside Judgment Of The Trial

Court And Remand For Dismissal Pursuant To Settlement Agreement” filed by

the parties. We construe this motion as a motion for voluntary dismissal of this

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). It is the court’s opinion that the

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. motion should be granted; therefore, we set aside the trial court’s judgment

without regard to the merits and remand this case to the trial court to render

judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See id.; Innovative Office

Sys., Inc. v. Johnson, 911 S.W.2d 387, 388 (Tex. 1995) (order).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED: December 4, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI