Chesapeake Operating, Inc. v. Samuel Crowder and Jane Crowder
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-14-00323-CV
CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, INC. APPELLANT
V.
SAMUEL CROWDER AND JANE APPELLEES CROWDER
------------
FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 2011-008169-3
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
We have considered the “Joint Motion To Set Aside Judgment Of The Trial
Court And Remand For Dismissal Pursuant To Settlement Agreement” filed by
the parties. We construe this motion as a motion for voluntary dismissal of this
appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). It is the court’s opinion that the
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. motion should be granted; therefore, we set aside the trial court’s judgment
without regard to the merits and remand this case to the trial court to render
judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See id.; Innovative Office
Sys., Inc. v. Johnson, 911 S.W.2d 387, 388 (Tex. 1995) (order).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.
DELIVERED: December 4, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chesapeake Operating, Inc. v. Samuel Crowder and Jane Crowder (Chesapeake Operating, Inc. v. Samuel Crowder and Jane Crowder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.