Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. Albert E. Sorge

179 F.2d 237
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 14, 1949·No. 10913_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel.

And it appearing that the verdict of the jury is supported by substantial evidence, and that the court correctly applied the law in its rulings and charge to the jury;

And no reversible error being shown:

It is ordered that the judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. Albert E. Sorge, 179 F.2d 237 (6th Cir. 1949).

179 F.2d 237 (Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. Albert E. Sorge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Orville Chester Garrison v. United States
179 F.2d 237 (Eighth Circuit, 1949)