Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. Albert E. Sorge

179 F.2d 237
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedDecember 14, 1949
Docket10913_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 179 F.2d 237 (Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. Albert E. Sorge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. Albert E. Sorge, 179 F.2d 237 (6th Cir. 1949).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel.

And it appearing that the verdict of the jury is supported by substantial evidence, and that the court correctly applied the law in its rulings and charge to the jury;

And no reversible error being shown:

It is ordered that the judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Orville Chester Garrison v. United States
179 F.2d 237 (Eighth Circuit, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
179 F.2d 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chesapeake-ohio-railway-company-v-albert-e-sorge-ca6-1949.