Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. United States

296 U.S. 187, 56 S. Ct. 164, 80 L. Ed. 147, 1935 U.S. LEXIS 1119
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 25, 1935
DocketNos. 549, 550
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 296 U.S. 187 (Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. United States, 296 U.S. 187, 56 S. Ct. 164, 80 L. Ed. 147, 1935 U.S. LEXIS 1119 (1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a suit to restrain the enforcement of an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, made February 7, 1935, relating to rates for the transportation of coal from mines in Kentucky and West Virginia, respectively, and requiring the establishment of rates, as described, in order to remove an undue prejudice found to result from *188 existing rates. 201 I. C. C. 165; 206 I. C. C. 445. Upon the hearing by the District Court, composed of three judges, the injunction was denied and the bill of complaint dismissed, but a restraining order was entered staying the enforcement of the Commission’s order pending appeal to this Court. 11 F. Supp. 588. The Railway Company and intervening shippers appeal from so much of the decree as denied the injunction and dismissed the bill of complaint, and the United States, the Interstate Commerce Commission, and others, appeal from that part of the decree which stayed the enforcement of the Commission’s order.

This Court, upon an examination of the record, agrees with the conclusion of the District Court that the order in question was sustained by findings of the Commission acting within its statutory authority and that these findings were adequately supported by evidence. The decree denying injunction and dismissing the bill of complaint is affirmed. Texas & New Orleans R. Co. v. United States, 295 U. S. 395.

This disposition of the case makes it unnecessary to pass upon that portion of the decree which stayed the enforcement of the Commission’s order. See Virginian Ry. Co. v. United States, 272 U. S. 658.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seatrain Lines, Inc. v. United States
233 F. Supp. 199 (D. New Jersey, 1964)
Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. United States
101 F. Supp. 317 (N.D. Illinois, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
296 U.S. 187, 56 S. Ct. 164, 80 L. Ed. 147, 1935 U.S. LEXIS 1119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chesapeake-ohio-railway-co-v-united-states-scotus-1935.